Notes

R. C. Bogdan and S. K. Biklen, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1992), p. 49.

L. A. Glenny, Autonomy of Public Colleges: The Challenge of Coordination (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959); R. O. Berdahl, Statewide Coordination of Higher Education (Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1971); J. D. Millett, Conflict in Higher Education: State Government Coordination Versus Institutional Independence (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1984).

E. B. Schick et. al., Shared Visions of Public Higher Education Governance: Structures and Leadership Styles that Work (Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Colleges and Universities, 1992).

C. Kerr, Preserving the Master Plan (San Jose: The California Higher Education Policy Center, 1994).

J. Folger and D. P. Jones, Using Fiscal Policy to Achieve State Education Goals: State Policy and College Learning (Denver: Education Commission of the States, 1993).

W. Zumeta, ?State Policies and Private Higher Education: Policies, Correlates, and Linkages,? in Journal of Higher Education 63, no. 4 (July/August 1992), pp. 364­417.

A. C. McGuinness, R. M. Epper and S. Arredondo, State Postsecondary Education Structures Handbook (Denver: Education Commission of the States, 1994). We have chosen to characterize Georgia (which includes both two- and four-year institutions under a single statewide governing board) differently than the authors. We also placed Florida in the first of two categories under which it is listed in the reference work.

B. Clark, ?The Many Pathways of Academic Coordination,? in Higher Education 8, no. 3 (1979).

Schick et. al., Shared Visions, p. 23.

Ibid., pp. 7­8.

M. Hammer and J. Champy, Reengineering the Corporation (New York: Harper Business, 1993), p. 35.

P. M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (New York: Doubleday Currency, 1990), pp. 44­47.

M. J. Wheatley and M. Kellner-Rogers, ?Self-Organization: The Irresistible Future of Organizing,? in Strategy and Leadership (July/August 1996), pp. 18­24.

Kent Halstead defines equitable intra-system allocation as the ?average absolute departure of member institutions from national control-type full instruction expenditures per FTE student norms adjusted to the mean deviation for all institutions in the state public higher education system.? K. Halstead, Higher Education Report Card 1995 (Washington D.C.: Research Associates of Washington, 1996), p. 54.

Estimates of gubernatorial authority derive from our study, but are consistent for all seven states with the analysis of J. M. Burns, J. W. Peltason, and T. E. Cronin, State and Local Politics: Government by the People (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990), p. 113.


[ DOWNLOAD | CONTENTS | PREVIOUS | NEXT ]


[ HOME | REPORTS | CROSSTALK | RESOURCES | ORDER ]