Few states can match the complexity of the environment of higher
education in New York. Geographically, demographically, economically,
and politically, the state is divided between New York City in
the south and the rest of the state, upstate New York. The two
public multicampus systems that govern all public higher education
in New York are likewise divided: the City University of New York
(CUNY) has 19 campuses in New York City, while the State University
of New York (SUNY) has 64 campuses scattered throughout upstate
New York. Every state has regional differences that influence
the governance of higher education. Only in New York, however,
are these regional differences-and disputes-reflected in the formal
structure and governance of the state's higher education system.
A strong private sector with 138 two- and four-year colleges and
universities constitutes an influential third element in the state
system.
Contextual Variables for New York Compared to Selected States (Numbers in Parentheses Represent Rank Among the Seven Study States) |
||||
(1-2) |
(3-5) |
(6-7) |
Average |
|
| Population (in Millions) (1995) | ||||
| Per Capita Income (in Thousands) (1995) | ||||
| Potential Tax Revenue (1995-96)** | ||||
| New High School Graduates per 1,000 Population (1995-96)* | ||||
| Role of Private Higher Education§ | ||||
| Role of Governor* | ||||
| % of Population with Associate Degree (1990) | ||||
| % of Population with Baccalaureate Degree (1990) | ||||
| % of Population with Graduate or Professional Degree (1990) | ||||
| % of Population 24 Years Old or Younger (1995) | ||||
| % of Population that is Anglo (1990) | ||||
| % of Population Who Do Not Speak English in Home (1990) | ||||
| % of Population in Poverty (1994) | ||||
| High School Dropout Rate (1992 to 1994 Average) | ||||
| * This figure is expressed as an Index: National Average = 100.
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, data are drawn from Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac 43, no. 1 (September 1996), pp. 79, 81. |
||||
Differences between New York City and the rest of the state are
important in understanding the environment in New York. As Table
2 shows, New York City is home to over 40 percent of the state's
population and a majority of the state's ethnic minorities. Of
the 25,000 new high school graduates expected between 1994-95
and 2003-04, almost 50 percent will be from the New York City
and mid-Hudson regions.
Distribution of State Population Between New York City and the Rest of State |
||
| Total Population | ||
| White | ||
| Black | ||
| Indian | ||
| Asian | ||
| Hispanic | ||
| Other | ||
| Source: Compiled by the New York State Department of Economic Development from the 1990 U.S. Census. | ||
Politics in New York State
The political environment of higher education in New York is characterized
by the shifting interactions of three major players: the Governor
and the respective leadership of the two legislative houses. Political
party affiliations, regional interests and personal philosophical
preferences overlay the formal roles of these players. For public
higher education, less visible but still influential are the state
control agencies that regulate other state agencies, as well as
the colleges and universities.
The Governor
In November 1994, Republican George E. Pataki defeated Mario M.
Cuomo, the three-term Democratic incumbent, for the governorship.
Governor Pataki was elected on a platform that promised to cut
taxes and shrink the government. As Governor, he is in the most
influential position concerning the state's higher education system.
He has line-item veto authority, he oversees negotiation of collective
bargaining agreements, and he appoints, with Senate approval,
all appointed SUNY Trustees. He appoints 10 of the 15 appointed
members of the CUNY Trustees, and members to the local nine-member,
largely advisory, college councils.
The pivotal role that a Governor can play in New York higher education
is evidenced by the number of times that informed observers tag
events with a Governor's name: Governor Dewey with the establishment
of SUNY; Governor Rockefeller with SUNY's expansion and with institutional
support of independent campuses; Governor Cuomo with declines
in that support and with neglecting his role in the planning process;
and at present, Governor Pataki with budget cutbacks.
Governor Pataki's priorities for higher education are, according
to a state official, "to improve educational outcomes within the
two public systems while simultaneously looking at economies of
scale in those systems." He added that these should not be seen
as mutually exclusive approaches, noting CUNY's efforts to move
remedial education from the four-year to the two-year campuses
as an example of their compatibility. At the same time, most respondents
agreed that higher education is not a high priority for the Governor,
and that employment is not his dominant issue. A senior SUNY central
administration officer said that the Governor, in probing for
the fundamental role of government, is asking the same questions
of higher education as he is of all state services. So far, this
officer said, the Governor "has not really articulated what" this
probing means for the colleges and universities.
Some observers see the Governor as very supportive of private
higher education and believe that the impact of the 1995-96 budget
cuts was more damaging to the public sector than to the private
sector. When elected, the Governor set up a ten-person "transition
team" to advise him on higher education policy. This group was
characterized by one observer as "dominated by the privates."
A former member of the transition team said that getting more
state support for the private sector was a major concern of the
group, noting also that little thought was given to major questions
of projected growth, location of campuses, and strategies for
economic development. The head of an independent campus agreed,
stating that "no one is really looking out for the whole picture."
The general belief among those in state government is that CUNY
has done more to address issues of productivity and efficiency
than SUNY. This more favorable impression of CUNY is attributed
by a CUNY administrator to "bad feelings" or "bad experiences"
that the Governor and senators may have had with SUNY, but not
with CUNY. A legislator suggested that CUNY has fared better because
its chancellor is more astute than SUNY's in political matters.
He added that "the Governor knows that CUNY's urban constituency
will put up a tougher fight than heavily suburban and rural SUNY."
The Legislature
New York has a full-time Legislature, one that has had a dramatic
growth in staff since the early 1970s. A senior legislative staff
member described the Legislature as "custodians" of higher education
with a "fairly significant role" in setting the missions for the
public campuses.
Under a Republican Governor, the Senate with its Republican majority
appears to have more influence than the Assembly in higher education
matters. Staff members of the Senate Higher Education Committee
attend governing board meetings, and work to assert legislative
priorities with Trustees and institutional officers. For example,
a cooperative-extension engineering program involving four SUNY
campuses is said to have resulted from informal conversations
between the committee chair and the dean of engineering at a SUNY
campus.
A Senate staff member said that the Legislature has generally
called for greater funding for higher education than the Governor
has provided, even when the Governor was a Democrat with a Republican
majority in the Senate. This observer noted that actions taken
by the Senate and the Assembly show that legislators believed
that the Governor's 1995-96 budget cuts were too severe. He added,
however, that the differences between the two houses "in terms
of what higher education is all about are even more significant"
than their differences with the Governor.
The State Agencies
The president of a SUNY campus pointed out that "the bureaucracy
of SUNY and the bureaucracy of the State of New York are very
different. SUNY leaves a great deal of independence to the campuses.
However, the state bureaucracy is very oppressive." Similarly,
a former chancellor of SUNY has deplored the "excessive regulatory
climate of New York state government, . . . as enforced by enormous
professional bureaucracies of the departments and offices of budget,
audit and control, general services, employee relations, civil
service, Attorney General, education, and the like."
Although some regulatory measures have been softened-e.g., elimination
of budgetary "line controls" on campus expenditures and limited
campus authority to spend tuition revenue-the former chancellor
of SUNY noted other major constraints of serious concern to SUNY's
campus presidents:
[ DOWNLOAD | CONTENTS | PREVIOUS | NEXT ]
[ HOME | REPORTS | CROSSTALK | RESOURCES | ORDER ]