This case study synthesizes interview data with other sources to paint a descriptive picture of governance and related issues facing New York's higher education system. The study is based on documents gathered from public offices, higher education institutions and relevant publications. Interviews with state officials, education administrators, board members, faculty, and staff took place in October and December of 1995, with telephone followup in 1996.



The Context of Governance: People & Politics

Demography
Politics in New York State

 

Few states can match the complexity of the environment of higher education in New York. Geographically, demographically, economically, and politically, the state is divided between New York City in the south and the rest of the state, upstate New York. The two public multicampus systems that govern all public higher education in New York are likewise divided: the City University of New York (CUNY) has 19 campuses in New York City, while the State University of New York (SUNY) has 64 campuses scattered throughout upstate New York. Every state has regional differences that influence the governance of higher education. Only in New York, however, are these regional differences-and disputes-reflected in the formal structure and governance of the state's higher education system. A strong private sector with 138 two- and four-year colleges and universities constitutes an influential third element in the state system.

Back to top

 

Demography

New York, with 18.5 million people, is the third largest state in the nation. New Yorkers are generally well-educated, particularly in terms of the percentage of the population who has a graduate or professional degree (see Table 1). Over one-fourth of the state's population is minority and 23 percent of its households speak a language other than English at home.

Table 1
Contextual Variables for New York Compared to Selected States
(Numbers in Parentheses Represent Rank Among the Seven Study States)
Contextual Variables
High
(1-2)
Average
(3-5)
Low
(6-7)
U.S.
Average
Population (in Millions) (1995)
18.1 (3)
Per Capita Income (in Thousands) (1995)
$26.8 (1)
$22.8
Potential Tax Revenue (1995-96)**
134 (1)
100
New High School Graduates per 1,000 Population (1995-96)*
8.7 (6)
9.6
Role of Private Higher Education§
Major
Role of Governor*
Strong
% of Population with Associate Degree (1990)
6.5 (4)
6.2
% of Population with Baccalaureate Degree (1990)
13.2 (4)
13.1
% of Population with Graduate or Professional Degree (1990)
9.9 (1)
7.2
% of Population 24 Years Old or Younger (1995)
34.0 (6)
35.5
% of Population that is Anglo (1990)
74.4 (5)
80.3
% of Population Who Do Not Speak English in Home (1990)
23.3 (3)
13.8
% of Population in Poverty (1994)
17.0 (3)
14.5
High School Dropout Rate (1992 to 1994 Average)
8.0 (7)
9.0
* This figure is expressed as an Index: National Average = 100.

Sources: Unless otherwise noted, data are drawn from Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac 43, no. 1 (September 1996), pp. 79, 81.
*
From K. Halstead, State Profiles for Higher Education 1978 to 1996: Trend Data (Washington, D.C.: Research Associates of Washington, 1996), p. 65.
§ From Task Force on State Policy and Independent Higher Education, The Preservation of Excellence in American Higher Education: The Essential Role of Private Colleges and Universities (Denver: Education Commission of the States, 1990), p. 35.
* From J. M. Burns, J. W. Peltason, and T. E. Cronin, State and Local Politics: Government by the People (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990), p. 113.


Differences between New York City and the rest of the state are important in understanding the environment in New York. As Table 2 shows, New York City is home to over 40 percent of the state's population and a majority of the state's ethnic minorities. Of the 25,000 new high school graduates expected between 1994-95 and 2003-04, almost 50 percent will be from the New York City and mid-Hudson regions.

Table 2
Distribution of State Population
Between New York City and the Rest of State
New York City
Rest of State
Total Population
7,332,564
10,667,891
White
3,166,125
9,297,064
Black
1,847,049
722,077
Indian
17,871
32,669
Asian
489,851
176,992
Hispanic
1,783,611
430,515
Other
21,157
8,574
Source: Compiled by the New York State Department of Economic Development from the 1990 U.S. Census.

Back to top

 

Politics in New York State

The political environment of higher education in New York is characterized by the shifting interactions of three major players: the Governor and the respective leadership of the two legislative houses. Political party affiliations, regional interests and personal philosophical preferences overlay the formal roles of these players. For public higher education, less visible but still influential are the state control agencies that regulate other state agencies, as well as the colleges and universities.

The Governor

In November 1994, Republican George E. Pataki defeated Mario M. Cuomo, the three-term Democratic incumbent, for the governorship. Governor Pataki was elected on a platform that promised to cut taxes and shrink the government. As Governor, he is in the most influential position concerning the state's higher education system. He has line-item veto authority, he oversees negotiation of collective bargaining agreements, and he appoints, with Senate approval, all appointed SUNY Trustees. He appoints 10 of the 15 appointed members of the CUNY Trustees, and members to the local nine-member, largely advisory, college councils.

The pivotal role that a Governor can play in New York higher education is evidenced by the number of times that informed observers tag events with a Governor's name: Governor Dewey with the establishment of SUNY; Governor Rockefeller with SUNY's expansion and with institutional support of independent campuses; Governor Cuomo with declines in that support and with neglecting his role in the planning process; and at present, Governor Pataki with budget cutbacks.

Governor Pataki's priorities for higher education are, according to a state official, "to improve educational outcomes within the two public systems while simultaneously looking at economies of scale in those systems." He added that these should not be seen as mutually exclusive approaches, noting CUNY's efforts to move remedial education from the four-year to the two-year campuses as an example of their compatibility. At the same time, most respondents agreed that higher education is not a high priority for the Governor, and that employment is not his dominant issue. A senior SUNY central administration officer said that the Governor, in probing for the fundamental role of government, is asking the same questions of higher education as he is of all state services. So far, this officer said, the Governor "has not really articulated what" this probing means for the colleges and universities.

Some observers see the Governor as very supportive of private higher education and believe that the impact of the 1995-96 budget cuts was more damaging to the public sector than to the private sector. When elected, the Governor set up a ten-person "transition team" to advise him on higher education policy. This group was characterized by one observer as "dominated by the privates." A former member of the transition team said that getting more state support for the private sector was a major concern of the group, noting also that little thought was given to major questions of projected growth, location of campuses, and strategies for economic development. The head of an independent campus agreed, stating that "no one is really looking out for the whole picture."

The general belief among those in state government is that CUNY has done more to address issues of productivity and efficiency than SUNY. This more favorable impression of CUNY is attributed by a CUNY administrator to "bad feelings" or "bad experiences" that the Governor and senators may have had with SUNY, but not with CUNY. A legislator suggested that CUNY has fared better because its chancellor is more astute than SUNY's in political matters. He added that "the Governor knows that CUNY's urban constituency will put up a tougher fight than heavily suburban and rural SUNY."

The Legislature

New York has a full-time Legislature, one that has had a dramatic growth in staff since the early 1970s. A senior legislative staff member described the Legislature as "custodians" of higher education with a "fairly significant role" in setting the missions for the public campuses.

Observers' perceptions of the chairs of the Higher Education Committees reflect the differing regional constituencies and party affiliations. We were told that there is greater focus in the Assembly than in the Senate on New York City issues, primarily concerning access and CUNY. The Senate, on the other hand, is said to be more interested in quality, economic development, job creation, and SUNY.

Under a Republican Governor, the Senate with its Republican majority appears to have more influence than the Assembly in higher education matters. Staff members of the Senate Higher Education Committee attend governing board meetings, and work to assert legislative priorities with Trustees and institutional officers. For example, a cooperative-extension engineering program involving four SUNY campuses is said to have resulted from informal conversations between the committee chair and the dean of engineering at a SUNY campus.

A Senate staff member said that the Legislature has generally called for greater funding for higher education than the Governor has provided, even when the Governor was a Democrat with a Republican majority in the Senate. This observer noted that actions taken by the Senate and the Assembly show that legislators believed that the Governor's 1995-96 budget cuts were too severe. He added, however, that the differences between the two houses "in terms of what higher education is all about are even more significant" than their differences with the Governor.

The State Agencies

The president of a SUNY campus pointed out that "the bureaucracy of SUNY and the bureaucracy of the State of New York are very different. SUNY leaves a great deal of independence to the campuses. However, the state bureaucracy is very oppressive." Similarly, a former chancellor of SUNY has deplored the "excessive regulatory climate of New York state government, . . . as enforced by enormous professional bureaucracies of the departments and offices of budget, audit and control, general services, employee relations, civil service, Attorney General, education, and the like."

Although some regulatory measures have been softened-e.g., elimination of budgetary "line controls" on campus expenditures and limited campus authority to spend tuition revenue-the former chancellor of SUNY noted other major constraints of serious concern to SUNY's campus presidents:

In New York, higher education's governing structures and processes must be understood in the context of the overarching state regulatory agencies that permeate them.

Back to top

[ DOWNLOAD | CONTENTS | PREVIOUS | NEXT ]


[ HOME | REPORTS | CROSSTALK | RESOURCES | ORDER ]